Delayed appointments and the policy implications

By Abubakar Jimoh

The continued reluctance exhibited by the executive and legislative arms towards confirmation of some key appointments and re-appointments in the country remains a major concern that if not promptly addressed will frustrate the good efforts and resources hitherto committed to the fulfilment of the present administration’s promises and mandates.

It is worrisome that half way and two years remaining for the administration to complete its first tenure and probably seek re-election, several appointments germane to the fulfilment of the promises made during electioneering campaigns and critical to the attainment of change mantra are yet to be announced.

Even amongst those announced, there are so many still awaiting Senate confirmation, while some are yet to be tabled before the Senate. This unwholesome development if not immediately arrested would negatively impact on the popularly and globally-acclaimed mandate of the Buhari Administration and militate against the delivery of its much-touted vision and objectives.

While the role of shopping and appointing the right candidates to fill various positions is an integral part of the executive’s mandates to coordinate policy direction and translate its agenda into impactful reality, the Nigerian Senate is constitutionally empowered for confirmation of Federal Executive appointments.

It would be recalled that in October 2015, following a public outcry condemning the delayed ministerial appointments by President Muhammadu Buhari, the need to restructure the Federal Government ministries and to effect his party’s mantra of change in government processes and operations were given to account for the delay in sending names of ministerial nominees to the Senate.

Following the appointment of Ministers into various ministries, one would wonder why the Presidency drags its foot from effecting new and renewed appointments in some departments and agencies through legislative endorsement.

The recent outright and persistent rejection of some appointments sent to the Nigerian Senate for confirmation by the Presidency not only backpedals the on-going executive’s efforts at shopping for right candidates into the right positions, but also a clear indication of unhealthy executive-legislative relation, which has serious implications on our nation’s political stability, democratic and governance process.

Among the key appointments awaiting confirmation by the Senate includes the Chairman, Director General and Members of Pension Commission, Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), the embattled Director General, Lottery Regulatory Commission, the reappointment of Chairman, Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC), Engr. Elias Mbam announced nearly a year ago but who is yet to assume duty following the inability of the Presidency to submit his name to the Senate for confirmation.

It is worthy to note that more vacancies are waiting to be filled in strategic Constitutional bodies like INEC where 37 slots of States Electoral Commissioners are still vacant, the Federal Civil Service Commission, the Federal Character Commission, Independent Corrupt Practices Commission, Federal Character Commission amongst numerous others. Most of these agencies of government play stabilizing roles in the political economy and continued existence of Nigeria.

Giving the above essential responsibilities, immediate attention to the confirmation of leadership and membership of such key institutions becomes imperative to ensure accelerated delivery of the present administration’s agenda.

Jimoh writes from AMAC Estate, Airport Road, Abuja

Emir Sanusi: When enough is enough

By Abubakar Jimoh

In recent times, one would have critically observed the persistent but unfair criticisms level by some Nigerians against the Emir of Kano State, HRH Alhaji Sanusi Muhammad Sanusi II for his constructive positions on pervasive socio-economic challenges permeating the Northern region or ill-advised government policies as they affect the nation at large.

We ought to appreciate the gallant and dogged Emir for standing firmly and articulating the mind-blowing but true positions about our stagnant socio-economic and political conditions for possible adjustments, even at the detriment of his throne. Such indeed, is a gift we should embrace and uphold.

Many have engaged written and other available means to advise him to shun public commentary and support every government’s decision or policy, not minding the dreadful consequences or probably to sail our already self-inflicted depressed economy towards a total recession.

The on-going verbal and written attacks against the Emir would however, not be a surprise as Yoruba adage puts its “Olooto kii ni eni” (i.e. the truthful one has nobody). Pardon me for the innate interpretation.

Some Nigerians are well known to hold strongly critics against any matter of public or policy concern without giving iota of proper and constructive digestion to the communal benefits of issue, as far as such is hitting on them. They make mockery of or conflagrate challenges facing one region in appreciation of their rosy ones.

Meanwhile, had the Emir been promoting obsolete or unrealistic socio-cultural practices backpedalling Northern development or commending every policy mistakes, the story would have of course won him encomium from every level of political sphere. Such is a society, where respect and dignity for traditional advice by the contemporary politicians are fast declining.

The lost respect and dignity would only be reverted in presence of some fundamental questions which often arise as: Who is the closest to the people? Who speak for the majority voiceless or poor?

We must on this note be mindful of some Northern leaders who, after the death of over 330 Northerners from Meningitis outbreaks, see themselves as angels, but poor citizens as sinners whose socio-economic problems can only be resolved by divine intervention, not good governance.

It is worrisome that our country has degenerated to a level where our socio-economic problems are not more of governance issues, but the wraths of God against the poor citizens.

We must remember that prior to ascending the throne, Sanusi was well known for his doggedness in articulating factual position on matters of public concern, even when such would cost his seat as then Governor of the Centre Bank of Nigeria.

Having observed the emergent socio-economic issues and archaic cultural practices as major impediments to the Northern region’s development and citizens’ well-beings, he comes openly and proffers holistic recommendations, instead of impressing political egos.

Giving the existing socio-economic problems backed by intrinsic cultural practices in the North, can we sincerely say Emir Sanusi is merely trying to impress the public? For instance, while adequate, accessible and affordable maternal and child is key to the development, survival and growth of every society, in various engagements by Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) across North revealed that the region is faced high level maternal and child mortality arising from inadequate budgetary allocation, overstretched, inaccessible and dilapidated Primary Health Care system.

Similarly, childhood under-nutrition remains very high in the region with about 2.2 million out of the 2.5 million severely acute malnourished children being from Northern Nigeria. Majority of children do not receive minimum acceptable diet. While 50% child mortality in the country has malnutrition as underlining cause, no fewer than 1200, out of 2600 estimated daily deaths are caused by malnutrition.

Relevant studies across the Northern States have exposed mothers personally consuming or selling Ready to Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF) meant for the treatment of their severely acute malnourished children. The situation which is intensified by existing rising poverty level hampers both local and international efforts at addressing childhood malnutrition and mortality in the region.

Apart from the above, adequate budgetary allocation to the social sector in the region is impeded by the on-going widespread dwindling revenue allocation from Federation Account to the states and low State Internally Generated Revenue.

It is in presence of decreasing resources and the growing financial incapacitation of many families that Emir Sanusi advises each family to be realistic in marrying number of wives or bearing children it can best carter for.

No fewer than 3 million out of school children, roaming the streets of Kano state, as Almajirai – pupils of Quranic schools are converted to beggars. The resultant socio-economic challenges of the situation was recently confirmed and seriously bemoaned by the State Governor, Abdullahi Ganduje during the Kaduna State Economic and Investment Summit, where he stressed that the “Almajiri syndrome is one of the serious problems worrying the North-west geopolitical zone”.

This precarious backdrop prompts the Emir Sanusi’s tenacious public opinion calling for an end to the region’s obsolete socio-cultural and identification of the regional economic advantages for the region’s socio-economic prosperity.

Finally, while I commend the Emir’s giant stride, being the father of the a state and representative of the voiceless, he should as a matter of urgency consider reducing the Emirate’s expenditure to barest minimum to avert wrong signal or sensationalised public opinion.

INEC Appointment: Civil Society condemns Anti-gender Politics

By Abubakar Jimoh

A Group of civil society organizations has condemned in totality the ongoing anti-gender politics and needless negative comments from the opposition party against the recent appointment of Mrs. Amina Bala Zakari as the Acting Chairman of Nigeria’s foremost Independent National Electoral Commission after the expiration of Prof. Attahiru Jega’s tenure.

In a press conference organized recently in Abuja, the group, which comprises: CISLAC, Women Aids Collective (WACOL), State of the Union (SOTU), Accountability for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health in Nigeria (AMHiN), Advocacy Nigeria, Women’s Rights Advancement and Protection Alternative (WRAPA), Women In Nigeria, Women Advocates’ Research and Documentation Center (WARDC), West Africa Civil Society Forum(WACSOF-Nigeria), Federation of Muslim Women Associations of Nigerian (FOMWAN), Centre for Democracy and Development, Partners on Electoral Reform, and Centre for Information Technology And  Development (CITAD), decried the hue and cry over what it described as “well-deserved appointment by President Muhammadu Buhari”.

The group said, “It must be noted that Mrs. Amina Zakari has been a serving commissioner with the INEC and has shared in the successes of the Prof. Jega led administration which is marked by transparency, fairness and free electoral process. She has also distinguished herself as she is among the six (6) commissioners penciled out for the proposed position of Chairman/chairperson of INEC.

“The President’s act of appointing Mrs. Zakari has been characterized as nepotism but as gender activists, we believe that judging by Mrs. Zakari’s antecedent, she was appointed based on merit. It is noteworthy that the integrity of the Acting Chairperson has not been questioned which should be the major consideration given the delicate and politically sensitive role of the institution. Hence, we applaud the effort of the President Muhammed Buhari for taking the first step toward fulfilling his electoral promise to empower Nigerian women. Therefore, the appointment of a woman to head this great institution that has successfully conducted two general elections in 2011 and 2015 is not only unprecedented but shows sensitivity to gender equality.”

The group bemoaned the claims that Mrs. Zakari’s appointment overrules the mandate of Prof. Jega, stating that it is the constitutional right of Mr. President to appoint whoever he wishes to steer the hallowed tide of INEC as an acting chairman/chairperson. “In the same vein, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can also appoint the Chairman of the Commission as a constitutional mandate. Therefore the appointment of a woman to head this great institution that has done Nigeria proud with two elections conducted since 2011 to 2015 is not only unprecedented by shows sensitivity to gender equality,” it explained.

It added: “The fear that the appointment could lead to tinkering with electoral processes should be allayed as the former Chairman of INEC made great effort to set up strong institution that any attempt by future leaders of the commission to thwart the processes will be easily detected. It is obvious that Mrs. Zakari also has impeccable record that has not been faulted by any including the opposition party.”

The group therefore, called for gender inclusion in governance to compliment effort of President Buhari at fulfilling campaign manifesto, and improve social development.  It further commended and encouraged the President to fulfill his promise to increase the number of women in positions of authority.

Confab Report: Between National Assembly and the Presidency

By Abubakar Jimoh

national-confab

As part of the efforts to exhaustively brainstorm and address identified challenges in Nigeria’s constitution, in March 2014 President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan inaugurated a National Conference, consisting about 492 delegates that represented a cross-section of Nigerians including the civil society groups and professional bodies.

It would be recalled that President Jonathan said while inaugurating the conference that its outcome might be subjected to a referendum.

While some Nigerians suggested that recommendations from the Conference be submitted to National Assembly for further deliberation, others argued in support of referendum primarily to ensure decisions therefrom are binding on every Nigeria. It was in support of latter that a reproductive health activist and former Country Director of an International Non-Governmental Organisation, IPAS Nigeria, Dr. Ejike Oji, in April 2014, suggested that the outcome of the ongoing National Conference be subjected to a national referendum, primarily to legitimise the its outcomes.

He said: “A national referendum should rubber stamp the outcome of the National Conference, because already, some people are saying that the delegates went on their own business, but with a referendum, the decision would be binding on every Nigerian.”

Similarly, Barrister Ferdinand Okotote, a Sokoto-based lawyer said if the outcome of the National Conference was to be binding on Nigerians, the people must have a say in the final outcome, as such an action would legitimise the decisions of the conference.

Also, in April, 2014 a nationwide opinion survey of personalities conducted by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) revealed that most respondents preferred ratification of conference decisions by referendum rather than Presidential or National Assembly endorsement.

At the peak of the Conference, Hon. Victor Ogene, the Deputy Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Media and Public Affairs raised alarm that the outcome of the conference might be an exercise in futility unless the 1999 constitution was further amended to make provision for referendum, as such was not provided for in the constitution.

“The only document we swore to uphold is the constitution. For any section to be altered, you need two third majority of both chambers of the National Assembly and two third of state assemblies. Unless this is done, the issue of referendum will not sail through, as there is nothing on referendum before the House,” he said.

Following the position by Hon. Ogene, many Nigerians were of the opinion that asking the National Assembly to ratify the conference decisions would be less expensive and bear no cost to the economy. According to them, the National Assembly is already an established institution; but conducting a referendum is like conducting fresh general elections, which would be more expensive and more cumbersome. In line with this, the Chairman of the Sokoto State chapter of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Mr. Steve Nwoke, was of the view that the resolutions of the conference should be submitted to the National Assembly for ratification. Just as a senior lecturer at the Niger Delta University (NDU), Mr. Ebipado Sapere-Obi, expressed uncertainty about a referendum, noting the absence of an enabling law for a referendum in Nigeria.

The conference, which lasted for five months was concluded in August 2014 with 22 volumes of reports and annexures totaling about 10,335 pages submitted to Jonathan. Receiving the reports, he assured Nigerians that it would not be a waste, stating that the quality of debate and the depth of contributions added to the ability of the delegates to resolve every argument without burying or suspending them was indicative of the fact that it was a new dawn in Nigeria and a new nation was at the door.

Jonathan disclosed that the report of the Conference would be sent to National Assembly and the Council of State for incorporation into the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Council is made up of governors, former presidents or heads of state, former Chief Justices of Nigeria, Senate President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

“As I receive the report of your painstaking deliberations, let me assure you that your work is not going to be a waste of time and resources. We shall do all we can to ensure the implementation of your recommendations which have come out of consensus and not by divisions. The discourse reflected our latest challenges. We shall send the relevant aspects of your recommendations to the Council of State and the National Assembly for incorporation into the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. On our part, we shall act on those aspects required of us in the Executive,” he said.

As Jonathan promised, by October 2014, the National Assembly through the spokesman of the House of Representatives, Zakari Mohammed disclosed that it had received the confab report, adding that every member of the House was issued the “compressed” report to study in preparation for its consideration any time soon.

“When we circulate reports, members will study them. We’ll consider the confab report very soon, maybe next week. I’ve not conferred with the rules and business committee, but I do know we’ll look at it very soon. We got a more compact report. What we have is a compressed document that you can easily study,” he said.

In his contribution, Senate Leader, Victor Ndoma-Egba, said the National Assembly had no choice than to go ahead with the process of Constitution amendment since the process had been ongoing long before the setting up of the National Conference.

He said it was only President Goodluck Jonathan who had the prerogative as the convener of the conference to determine what use the conference report would be put to, stating that on the part of the apex lawmakers, they were going ahead to give the country a new constitution.

Ndoma-Egba said: “Well, if you recall, the process of amendment of the Constitution has been going on before the National Conference was set up by President Jonathan. He has the responsibility to decide how he wants the confab report to be handled. If he wants to keep it like former President Olusegun Obasanjo did with his own Conference report, there is nothing anybody can do about it. So the constitution review will go on up to the State Houses of Assembly until it finally becomes operational. We cannot wait for the report of the conference before we conclude the constitution review process. The National Assembly will go ahead with it not minding the conference report,” Ndoma-Egba stated.

In the heat of 2015 presidential campaign, implementation of the National Conference reports took a difference dimension as it became a reference point following the visit of Jonathan to Ondo State as part of state wide campaign to shore up support for his second term ambition. Publicity Secretary of the Afenifere, a Yoruba socio political Organisation Organisation and delegate at the National Confere, Yinka Odumakin made a public disclosure of the group support for Jonathan because he convoked the National Conference and was ready to implement the report. Odumakin said the group was convinced about the commitment of the president to the National Confab and the implementation of the report.

Also speaking, Ondo State Governor, Dr Olusegun Mimiko said what Afenifere did was an unequivocal endorsement of the president. Dr. Mimiko said Afenifere expressed believe in the transformation agenda of the president describing it as systematic and strategic for the development of the nation.

Against this backdrop, a former Chief of Defence Staff, General Alani Akinrinade has bemoaned the endorsement of President Goodluck Jonathan by Afenifere noting that it was wrong. He said while members of the organisation might have their political leanings, it was wrong for some Yoruba leaders to use the platform to canvass for votes for a particular candidate. He said the Yoruba agenda brought before the National Conference failed.

The General also faulted the pro-Jonathan Yoruba leaders who said that the implementation of the report would benefit the people. He noted that the recommendations of the confab were below Yoruba’s target and wondered why the leaders would base their endorsement on that.

He said, “When the Yoruba sent their delegates, the cardinal points that can make a federation were practically not given to us. I can assure you, we missed all the targets. It will be preposterous of us now to expect that by the time that report is executed, we will end up with true federalism. We want to set the record straight that there are major things that have to be done before we can have a true federalism. It cannot be done by one President alone. Unless you change the rule now, you will need all the national and state assemblies to agree with you.”

He further noted that Ondo State Governor, Olusegun Mimiko, who has been holding several post-confab conferences, was only pushing the agenda of the Peoples Democratic Party. “By the look of things, it appears that they (Afenifere) were set up principally to canvass votes for Jonathan so that he might execute all the decisions reached at the last national confab,” he said.

Dancing to the tune of the moment, following the Federal Executive Council (FEC)’s approval of the modalities for implementation of the report as recommended by the conference at its meeting in March 2015, Jonathan ordered the immediate implementation of aspects of the national conference report, particularly policy matters that do not require constitution amendment, stating that other aspects would then be vetted and sent to the National Assembly.

“The national conference report came to the council today. You will recall that barely one year ago, Mr. President inaugurated the conference and at the end of their sitting, the conference came up with a report and submitted the report to him,” Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator Pius Anyim disclosed while briefing journalists after the meeting presided over by President Jonathan.

He continued: “… today, we are taking steps towards implementing the resolutions of the national conference and we believe in the vision of Mr. President in setting up the conference and the wonderful work done by eminent Nigerians who attended the conference in producing the report, the resolutions and recommendations, and we believe our country will benefit immensely from the work of this conference.

Step to implement the report has been met with prompt objection when a member of House of Representatives representing Ikole Ekiti/Oye Federal Constituency (I), Hon. Bimbo Daramola, who said President Jonathan’s campaign promise to implement the report of National Conference was misleading and belated, saying that the President has no constitutional power to implement the report, but only the National Assembly has the powers to implement the reports.

Conversely, Human Rights Lawyer, Mr. Tunji Braithwaite said, the National Assembly could never approve the resolutions of the National Conference because most of the resolutions did not favour corrupt politicians. He maintained that Jonathan goofed by not subjecting the resolutions of the conference to a referendum.

On related development, the decision by President Jonathan to implement the report has been supported by Senate President, David Mark, who recently assured his Benue South senatorial district of the creation of Apa State following the determination of President Jonathan to implement conference report. Mark while appealing to Idoma people during the grand finale of his re-election campaign in Otukpo stressed the need to re-elect Jonathan so that the long awaited dream state can become a reality. He however, said the report which would pass through the senate had already been received by the president who would implement the content if given a second term opportunity.

Also, commenting on the imperatives of implementing the report, Dr. Joe Nwogu, Secretary General of Ohaneze Ndigbo noted: “Amongst the fundamental flaws of the polity to be re-jigged include the devolution of political power away from the bloated centre to the states, fighting corruption, presentation of annual budget, revenue sharing, state creation and legislative structure. Other areas include pensions and gratuities for political office holders, state of government-acquired schools and the status of people living with disabilities.

“…For instance, with it each state will have their own constitution; its own police force, prison service and create their own local governments. The added benefits also include the freedom to own their sea ports, air ports and railways. Solid minerals that have been the exclusive preserve of the all-powerful Federal Government have been moved to the concurrent list for state government to also exploit.”

Moreover, the recent developments in the nation’s political atmosphere such as the emergence of General Muhammad Buhari as President-elect and observed high turnover in the national legislative chambers, present a fresh challenge to the implementation of the report. That is, will General Buhari implement the report? Will upcoming legislature vote for referendum or subject the report to deliberation? Only time can tell.

Dangerous Speech as Source of Election-Related Violence

By Abubakar Jimoh
electoral-violence
It has been argued that persuasion is better than force as a means of drawing public support or attention, that good book and good argument can improve the soul, yet the intuition remains that some speeches are in fact dangerous.
In linguistic perspective meanings are inherent in words, while such would be interpreted based on existing cultural and socio-linguistic context.  In the words of Jim Aune, American blogger, “dangerous speech” exists when a high-ethos sender delivers a factually inaccurate yet emotionally inflammatory message in a self-contained contact and context to receivers with a high level of anxiety in an unusually polarized historical context.
Although it is a well-known fact that under Section 39 (1) of the 1999 Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, every person is entitled to freedom of expression, including freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference. However, experience has shown that freedom of expression occasionally gives room to dangerous speech, which incites violence.
Nigeria is a signatory to the 2013 AU African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, an international legal instrument, which recognizes among other things freedoms of information and expression for citizens of member countries.
Speech is most often prohibited under international law for its possible consequences and capacity to result in an internationally unacceptable secondary effect, such as violence or genocide. This informed the opinion of Antoine Buyes, who wrote in Cambridge’s Journal of International and Comparative Law in 2014, where he provides three legal justifications that could traditionally pose restriction to freedom of expression. These are prevention of breaches of speech and protecting public orders; protection of targeted group, both regarding its members’ feeling and physical safety; and curtailment of speech to avert what society deems inappropriate.
So far, democracies have long struggled with the issue of restriction to expression of ideas and beliefs. It would be recalled that during 399 BC back in ancient Greece, the Athenians, who cherished individual freedom, nevertheless prosecuted Socrates for his teachings, claiming that he had corrupted young people through his teaching and insulted the gods.
In modern world, exceptions to free speech are provided in some countries like United States, where certain limitations to free speech and expressions are recognized by the Supreme Court. These exceptions have been created over time, based on certain types of speech and expression, and under different contexts. While freedom of speech in the United States is a constitutional right, these exceptions make that right a limited one. In this case, speech that involves incitement, false statements of fact, obscenity, child pornography, threats, and speech owned by others are all completely exempt protections.
Also, in Saudi Arabia, individual rights to freedom of speech are banned by the government; and any speech or public demonstration that is deemed to be immoral or may subject its national unity to danger can lead to imprisonment or corporal punishment.
More importantly, many writers have observed dangerous speech as a phenomenon which emanates from hate speech.  For instance, Joyce Arthur, a Canadian activist and writer, in a piece titled “Argument – Should hate speech be a crime?” offers to explain the point at which speech becomes dangerous. She wrote: “Hate speech is dangerous because words have power and can influence others to act. The assassinations of abortion providers in the US prove that words do not have to incite violence explicitly to cause violence. Hate speech promotes division and intolerance; it harms and marginalizes the vulnerable groups it targets. Free speech is exercised largely by the privileged at the expense of the unprivileged who do not have a level ground on which to respond.”
Experience has revealed that elections trigger inflammatory speech because they are analogous to battles, targeted to one opposition or another. This presents basic challenges in distinguishing between political speech, which constitutes the exercise of a human right, and remains essential for effective democracy; and the best practices for limiting dangerousness in speech, without curbing the exercise of freedom of expression.
Deliberating on how dangerous speech form a rudiment of violence, Susan Benesch, a Political scientist and Project Director at World Policy Institute reveals that inflammatory public speech rises steadily before outbreaks of mass violence, suggesting that it is a precursor or even a prerequisite for violence, which makes sense: groups of killers do not form spontaneously. “In most cases, a few influential speakers gradually incite a group to violence”.
Benesch provides five fundamental qualitative variables to discern the dangerousness of speech, offering a useful model for analyzing hate speech case studies. These include the level of a speaker’s influence, the grievances or fears of the audience, whether or not the speech act is understood as a call to violence, the social and historical context, and the way in which the speech is disseminated.
The facts raise by the Project Director was evident in Kenya and Rwanda…. In the past two decades, Rwanda and Kenya have experienced considerable violence. The two countries remain useful case studies to discern when and how hate speech becomes dangerous speech.  For instance, provocative role of Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines in the Rwandan genocide has been widely condemned, as it offers a definitive example of dangerous speech. The radio was reportedly encouraging people to participate in genocide because it said ‘the enemy is the Tutsi’—the minority population constituted 14%. United Human Rights Council estimated that some 200,000 people participated in the perpetration of the genocide, which by April, 1994, left 800,000 men, women, and children perished.
Similarly, In Kenya, the media, particularly local language radio, have been accused of being responsible for fuelling ethnic hatred and violence in the aftermath of the 2005 referendum campaign and 2007 presidential elections. Local language radio stations were reportedly routinely partisan and unethical. The extent at which talk shows provided the greatest opportunities for dangerous speech was widely reported. IRI reported that immediately after elections’ results were announced, gangs of youths blocked Kenya’s main roads and set fire to hundreds of homes of perceived ‘outsiders’, resulting in the death of more than 1,200 people and some 600,000 displaced into temporary camps, with an equal number seeking refuge with friends or relatives.
In order to prevent dreadful impact of violence that emanate from dangerous speech, perpetrators must be held accountable, following a concrete proof that speech can be shown to induce violence. It has been recommended that violence may be prevented by interfering with the process through inhibiting the speech, limiting its dissemination, undermining the credibility of the speaker, or inoculating the audience against the speech so that it is less influential, or dangerous.

Electoral process: security is critical but must not be political—EU EOM

By Abubakar Jimoh
eu
The European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) has acknowledged the different views about the postponement of general elections to 28 March and 11 April by Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and promised to continue observing electoral process.
The Mission said this, following statements by respective security chiefs who unanimously reiterated that safe elections could not be guaranteed at this time.
 “We are seriously concerned at this delay and the reason given. Security is critical but must not be political. People have to be able to vote, elections have to be held so that government is accountable. We look to the security agencies to give full support to INEC and all the people of Nigeria in the holding of polls on 28 March and 11 April.
 “The EU EOM commends the peaceful reaction so far to the postponement and will continue observing the electoral process.  We encourage all political parties, candidates, supporters and other stakeholders to consider the extra time as an opportunity to further prepare for the election days. More voters can collect their Permanent Voters Cards, candidates can elaborate on their proposed policies,” said Chief Observer Santiago Fisas.
Fisas emphasized “For citizens to have confidence in the electoral process, the polls should not be further delayed. People need to know this and to see what is being done by the different authorities to make this happen. We will be here in different parts of the country observing the next crucial weeks in the run up to the election and beyond.”
It would be recalled that the European Union was invited to deploy an observation mission by the Nigerian authorities and has signed Memorandums of Understanding with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Africa: Emerging trends in Governance, Corruption and Security

By Abubakar Jimoh

abujimoh-ti

Abubakar Jimoh speaking at the meeting in Kigali, Rwanda

As part of the efforts to provide leadership in advancing good governance and anti-corruption agenda through exhaustive brainstorming and timely experience sharing, Transparency International recently organized three days annual regional meeting in Kigali comprising African regional chapters of Transparency International.

The meeting which was hosted by TI-Rwanda aimed at sharing experience on the newly emerging challenges across the continent including citizens’ participation in governance, illicit financial flows and governance for peace and securities,.

Giving his opening remarks at the meeting, Apollinaire Mupiganyi, Executive Director of Transparency International, Rwanda said, “TI as a global movement is committed to fight corruption, illicit flows and ensure corruption free society. In fighting corruption, TI hinges on, among others, mobilizing and supporting citizens around the world to speak up and take action against corruption.

“This meeting provides a very timely opportunity for participants across African region to reflect citizen participation in governance processes, illicit financial flows and governance for peace and security. Citizen participation in democratic governance is essential to achieve a well governed society. Effective participation requires public trust between governments and citizen, as well as deliberate and structured, transparent government effort to engage citizens. Citizens can mobilise to hold their leader accountable, and demand spaces for participation and accountability.”

Also, Chantal Uwimana, Regional Director for Sub-Sahara Africa at Transparency International saw the Forum as a very timely opportunity for African participants to reflect on the importance of citizens’ participation in the region. She said, “In a number of occasions, it was reported that citizens are not educated to effectively participate in governance. It is therefore, the responsibility of civil society to properly educate citizens to properly educate citizen to demand accountability.”

Ambassador Fatuma Ndangiza, Deputy Chief Executive Officer on Decentralization and Good Governance Promotion at Rwanda Governance Board and the Guest of Honour at the Forum stressed that “Africa is a vibrant continent, however, the current crises on the continent remains a security challenges in Africa.  It is therefore, African responsibility to work in collaboration to fight corruption, illicit financial flows and insecurity using a preventive approach rather than being ‘fire fighter’.”

A paper titled “Citizen Participation in Africa: A General Overview” presented by Paul Banoba of  Africa Department of Transparency International accessed the state of good governance, citizens participation and security in Africa using four major thematic focuses of Mo Ibrahim Index of African Governance such as Safety and Rule of Law—Rule of Law, Accountability, Personal Safety, National Security; Participation and Human Rights—Citizen Participation, Rights, Gender; Sustainable Economic Opportunity—Public Management, Business Environment, Infrastructure, Rural Sector; Human Development—Welfare, Education, Health.

Surprisingly, the report, which compared data between 2005-2009 and 2009-20013, shows in a scale of 6.0: Overall Governance, 1.2 and 0.9; Safety and Rule of Law, -1.5 and -0.8; Participation and Human Rights, 0.7 and 2.4; Sustainable Economic Opportunity, 3.4 and -0.2; Human Development, 2.2 and 2.3. In a scale of 4.0, the report identifies under Participation and Human Rights sub-category, change in participation, gender and rights scoring 3.8, 2.4 and 0.9 respectively.

Meanwhile, in the analysis of Banoba, across the region, 2013 Global Corruption Barometer (GCB) shows an average of 53% of people paid a bribe to one of eight service providers in the preceding 12 months.

In terms of citizens engaging in corruption, GCB reveals in Sierra Leone, 84%; Liberia, 75%; Kenya, 70%; Mozambique, 62%; Zimbabwe, 62%; Cameroon, 62%; Uganda, 61%; Senegal, 57; Tanzania, 56; Ghana, 54%; South Africa, 47%; DR Congo, 46%; Ethiopia, 44%; Nigeria, 44%; South Sudan, 39%; Madagascar, 28%; and Rwanda 13% people.

He listed as positive trends in citizen participation, increased collaboration between Anti-corruption agencies and Civil Society; developments in mechanisms for citizens to report corruption; Toll Free lines; participatory increased via technology; increase in citizen originated participation mechanisms.

However, Banoba lamented some negative developments including: Freedom of Information Legislation, which has been passed into law by very few African countries—Angola, Ethiopia, Guinea, Liberia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe; Whistle-Blower protection legislation, which has been passed into law by very few African countries; inadequate facilitation for participation; and legislation and proposed legislation threatening civil society intervention.

A paper presented by Transparency International-Senegal noted that like every other country in Africa, Senegal has inherited from colonial master some legal frameworks, which do not reflect the socio-political reality in the country. The country presently experiences poor working relationship among the executive, legislature and judiciary. The paper reiterated the need for citizens to properly understand the constitutional mandates of legislature, as they relate the primary responsibility of legislature to provision of roads, schools etc.; while legislature are constitutional mandated to represent, make law and control action of government.

Also Jimmy Luhende of Actions for Democracy and Local Governance (ADLG) representing Transparency International-Tanzania as part of the efforts to encourage citizens participation in governance, the use of ‘Animation’—an approach built on notion that Tanzanians shall realize their innate potential for improving their lives through inclusive and participatory democracy where a collective action is a result of involvement of all members of a community. Through this, skills development and capacity building training is organized for selected teachers, farmers and religious leaders to ensure they are well-informed to demand accountability from the government.

According to Luhende, “Lots of community dialogues to challenge practices, promote individual innovations, reflections and critical thinking towards inspiring citizens to take collective decisive actions. These dialogues are results of animation trainings and innovative mentoring for individuals selected by respective community members.

“Dialogues happen at Village levels, ward level where ward leaders are involved and at district level where district officials are also involved. This is the period where mentoring is done for special reasons and is done by an animator (animators support one another) an active farmer animator visits another village where a farmer animator needs support.”

Interestingly, while responding to presentation by Luhende, Abubakar Jimoh representating the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) also Nigeria contact of TI, shared Nigeria’s experience noting that various engagements have exposed inexperience of many policy makers about their mandated roles and responsibilities creating a wide gap between them and citizens. Jimoh urged the TI-Tanzania to also incorporate policy makers in its thematic focus rather than only electorate. Also, as a question to Senegal, Jimoh demanded to understand the level of gender participation in the governance in Senegal. In response, Presenter from Senegal disclosed that Senegal adopted in 2012, a law to encourage participation of women; and legislature has legislated that one man will come with a women in a constituency for elected position.  He however, lamented weakness in the implementation of the law; and poor contribution by women in political activities.

Dr. Félicien Usengumukiza, the Chief Executive Officer at Research and Monitoring of Rwanda Governance Board (RGB) in his presentation titled “Homegrown Initiatives (HGIs) and Citizen Participation in Rwanda”, he highlighted some Home Grown Initiatives solutions developed by the Rwandan citizens to fast track their development building on local opportunities, cultural values and history. HGIs have enabled Rwandans to come up with appropriate solutions to the local development context, and have been the bedrock to the Rwandan success for the last decade.

Some of HGIs explained in his analysis include: Usengumukiza include: Umuganda—a day intended to build community involvement and strengthen cohesion between persons from different background and levels;  Abunzi—instituted Mediation Committees to solve problems among Neighbours; Imihigo—practice adopted as a means of planning to accelerate progress towards economic development and poverty reduction; Ubudehe—an initiative established to help local people create social capital, nurture citizenship and build a strong civil society to engage in local problem-solving using their own locally designed institutions; Itorero—a school of civic education for all citizens; Girinka—a traditional practice consisting of donating cows to a fellow citizen as a sign of deep friendship and cohesion;  Agaziro—an avenue where Rwandans have the opportunity  to take a more active role in owning the nation’s development.

According to the Chief Executive Officer, Rwanda has “concurrently implemented all forms of decentralization considered to be the main mechanism in promoting good governance (through improved participation, promotion of transparency and accountability, and setting up responsive and sensitive decentralized structures), enhance local economic development (through efficient and effective implementation of development programs) and bringing quality and accessible services closer to the citizens.”

He however, itemised some areas demanding more efforts for better improvement such as regional and international security, rural development, balance of payment deficit, population growth, youth employment, infrastructure, income distribution, urbanization and land management.

More importantly, sharing experience of state of governance in Zimbabwe, in a paper titled “Governance for Peace and Security: A Zimbabwean Case Study”, Mary Jane Ncube of Transparency International Zimbabwe (TI Z) noted that in 2014, sufficient evidence from TI Z’s different advocacy and research activities reveals worse state of governance with less than 20% in statistics. Also, in her analysis, more recently World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessments (CPIA) scored Zimbabwe 1.5 of a possible score of 6 on transparency, accountability and corruption in the public sector rating.

She said, “In October 2013, the Mo Ibrahim Governance Index ranked Zimbabwe 47 of 52 countries and declared Zimbabwe the worst governed country in Africa. In 2014 the Mo Ibrahim Index ranked Zimbabwe 46 of 54 countries assessed with a score of 38% against the Continent average of 51.5. On rule of law Zimbabwe is ranked 42th of 52 countries with a score of 29%. On Accountability the ranking was 44 of 52 African countries with a score of 23.6.

“The business of government has been relegated to the back seat as ruling party internal politics (factional infighting) are with seemingly deliberate intention allowed to assume supremacy over all other. The infighting is liberally played out in the media partly as agenda setting for the 2018 elections and partly as a distraction from the real issues of economic decline and human insecurity.

“Lip service is paid to the back sliding economy while in fact, there is no political will to address the fundamentals necessary for its resuscitation. Policy development and implementation are limited only to the extent to which it furthers the dynasties of the political elite. The over emphasis on the high level mineral mining sector for example is borne from the vested interests of  individuals within the  ruling party and security sector rather than national interests.”

Ncube bemoaned the dampening state of peace in Zimbabwe having a direct reflection of a society moulded by repression, intimidation, apathy, patronage, kleptocracy and ignorance, stressing that police has become an institution used to control, repress and intimidate the society. “Recently the police were captured on film beating to death the owner of a passenger commuter bus (Matatu). A few days later an activist in peaceful protest against the current economic hardships besetting the country was beaten up in public view at Unity Square Gardens right in the middle of Harare,” she explained.

A presentation by Nora Honkaniemi of ActionAid, Kenya titled “Illicit Financial Flows and Tax” explained that illicit financial flows deprive Africa of billions of dollars each year, more than is received in overseas development aid or foreign direct investment combined.

“Figures vary between 50 and 160 billion USD a year depending on what outflows are calculated and during what time period. Illicit financial flows are commonly associated with criminal activity like drug dealing, smuggling or human trafficking. But according to the African Union High Level Panel on IFF, 60-65% of illicit movements involve multinationals and commercial transactions like corporate tax evasion and avoidance.

“Multinational companies can be found to be operating in Africa while contributing little in the way of taxes, depriving countries of badly needed domestic resources. Multinationals often defraud countries of tax revenue by using mechanisms like transfer mispricing, or by exploiting tax treaties to hide their profits in places offering very low tax rates or by abusing tax incentives. These mechanisms allow for financial secrecy, preventing taxation where taxation is due and contribute to the illicit outflow of finances from developing countries. From a development perspective impact is disastrous: these lost resources could pay for schools, hospitals and other essential services and reduce dependence on external financing,” she lamented.

Similarly, Antonio M.A. Pedro in a presentation titled “Illicit financial flows and governance of natural resources: A perspective” argued in support of Honkaniemi when he quoted a fact that “at least US$1trillion leaves developing countries each year through corrupt activity that involves shady deals for natural resources, anonymous shell companies, money laundering and illegal tax evasion. Redressing these challenges requires specific policies and action to increase transparency and combat corruption in financial secrecy, natural resources deals and money laundering.”

After critical experience sharing and exhaustive deliberations on a number of regional efforts to curb such emerging trends, in order to enhance citizen participation, participants declared to put in place mechanisms to protect their citizens’ voices; simplify information encourage communities participation in public policy issues; build on existing citizens own structural organizations to  enhance civic participation; develop and strengthen mechanisms for citizens to report corruption; advocate for enacting and implementing Freedom of Information and whistleblower protection laws.

To combat illicit financial flows, participant noted the need to domesticate all the transfer operations all along the mining operation process; reduce the anonymous share companies; build infrastructure capacities; disclose information on beneficial ownership of companies; enhance capacity to properly analyse Information provided by companies; continue building on existing initiatives such as EITI; reinforce knowledge of the chapters about taxation; examine the existing taxation agreements and advocate for revision, renegotiation or cancellation if necessary to avoid the financial flows from taxation, advocate for a conducive legal framework to detect and report the IFF from taxation; make taxation disclosure part of the social responsibility requirements.

The best practices identified by the Forum to attain governance for peace and security include: community policing; establishing anti-corruption unit in the police; initiating participation by police and army in public works with the community; initiating mechanisms that helps police to implement anticorruption policies; and building good partnership with police by informing the citizens.